When does "litigation" become sufficient to trigger litigation
17 documents referred to in a letter sent to the SFO by the company's legal advisors. The majority of these documents were or reflected the accountants' reports (to be treated in the same way as (b) above). Two of these documents were internal email communications between a senior executive and the then Head of Mergers and Acquisitions (a ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Inadvertently disclosed privileged documents: what should a
The principle in Guinness Peat Properties Ltd. and Another v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1027 is that in such cases of obvious mistake, the court should "ordinarily intervene in such cases, unless the case is one where the injunction can properly be refused on the general principles affecting the grant of a discretionary ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Privilege -Common Interest Privilege and Waiver
not a waiver (Guinness Peat); non-inadvertentdiscoveryofadocumentfor which privilege could have been claimed is a waiver (Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited (1989) 88 ALR 69); disclosure to an expert witness for the purposes of proceedings is not a waiver (Dingwall v Commonwealth (1992) 39 FCR521); disclosure to a party's accounting ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Privilege Accidents will happen
September/October 2017 the other party's documents owed that party no duty of care and was generally entitled to assume that any privilege for those documents had been waived.Web
اقرأ أكثر
Coats Group plc
1. This Annual Report is for the year ended 31 December 2014, throughout which the company was known as Guinness Peat Group plc ('GPG' or 'the Company'). 2. On 26 February 2015, Guinness Peat Group plc was renamed Coats Group plc. All references in this document toWeb
اقرأ أكثر
Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership …
Susan Rosser and Jonny Cohen consider a recent case of accidental disclosure 'When a document is disclosed which is, on its face, privileged, it falls to the inspecting party to …Web
اقرأ أكثر
High Court finds litigation privilege applies despite third party …
15 June, 2021 In a recent decision, the High Court has found that a pre-action letter sent by the claimant to a third party, and the third party's response, were subject to litigation privilege, overturning the decision of the Master who had found that privilege did not apply.Web
اقرأ أكثر
Litigation privilege: whose privilege? | RPC
The court rejected Glencore's argument holding that Guinness Peat was not authority for the general proposition that that a person controlling litigation can assert litigation privilege against the party which it is controlling …Web
اقرأ أكثر
GROUP STRUCTURE
Netherlands Guinness Peat Group International Holdings BV Naritaweg 165, 1043 BW, Amsterdam, Netherlands €43,146 Ordinary New Zealand Coats Patons (New Zealand) Ltd 3 Mana Place, Wira, Auckland, New Zealand NZD1.00 Ordinary Nicaragua Coats de Nicaragua SA Altamira d'este, Rotonda Madrid #235, Managua, Nicaragua NIO100.00 …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Issued ordinary share capital of guinness peat group
issued ordinary share capital of Guinness Peat Group Plc <GNSP.L>, Equiticorp said in a statement.'. Explanation: The word 'coffee_berry' is used in the sentence to mean 'EQUITICORP HOLDING IN GUINNESS REACHES 59.93 PCT Equiticorp Holdings Ltd <EQUW.WE> now owns or has received acceptances representing 59.93 pct of the …Web
اقرأ أكثر
CIIL PROCEDURE NEWS
A non-party cannot assert litigation privilege against a party over which it has control: Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership (1987) not followed. As …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Guinness Peat Group
With effect from 13 December 2002, Brunel Holdings plc became the legal parent of GPG (UK) Holdings plc, then named Guinness Peat Group plc, and its subsidiary undertakings, in a share-for-share transaction. Owing to the relative values of the companies, the former Guinness Peat Group plc shareholders held over 98% of the enlarged group.Web
اقرأ أكثر
CIIL PROCEDURE NEWS
A non-party cannot assert litigation privilege against a party over which it has control: Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership (1987) not followed. As such, the defendants could not assert litigation privilege over the documents in question. Furthermore, should it be the case—contrary to the judge's primary finding—Web
اقرأ أكثر
Disclosure and litigation privilege | Feature | Law Gazette
The defendants countered by arguing that in a case in which a person is 'in all but name the effective defendant to the proceedings' the privilege will belong to that person (Guinness Peat ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Litigation privilege: whose privilege? | RPC
The court rejected Glencore's argument holding that Guinness Peat was not authority for the general proposition that that a person controlling litigation can assert …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Get the free Guinness Peat Group plc ( GPG or the Company
28 October 2014 Guinness Peat Group plc (GPG or the Company) Q3 2014 Interim Management Statement GPG today publishes its interim management statement (IMS) covering the period from 1 July to 27 October. Fill form: Try Risk Free. Form Popularity .Web
اقرأ أكثر
Inadvertently disclosed privileged documents: what …
The principle in Guinness Peat Properties Ltd. and Another v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1027 is that in such cases of obvious mistake, the court should "ordinarily intervene in such cases, …Web
اقرأ أكثر
No litigation privilege for controller of litigation under conduct of
The Sellers contended that Guinness Peat was binding authority for the proposition that where a person is "in all but name" a party to proceedings, then that person may assert privilege over documents created for the dominant purpose of …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership [1987] 1
Susan Rosser and Jonny Cohen consider a recent case of accidental disclosure 'When a document is disclosed which is, on its face, privileged, it falls to the inspecting party to determine whether the document has been disclosed in error or whether privilege has been deliberately waived.'.Web
اقرأ أكثر
Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership
87/0296 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION OFFICIAL …Web
اقرأ أكثر
State Papers: Gerry Collins raised concerns that Guinness Peat …
The warning came as confidential documents released as part of the State Archives revealed that the Limerick TD believed in 1990 that GPA was making excessive use of both the department and Irish ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Privilege -Common Interest Privilege and Waiver
not a waiver (Guinness Peat); non-inadvertentdiscoveryofadocumentfor which privilege could have been claimed is a waiver (Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Overview :: AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER)
AerCap plays an important role in connecting the world, both people and places, supporting global economic and social development. In addition, each year we support a range of local charities and organizations in our global communities through fundraisers and volunteering initiatives. A number of our charitable donations involve the matching of ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
High Court finds litigation privilege applies despite third party …
15 June, 2021 In a recent decision, the High Court has found that a pre-action letter sent by the claimant to a third party, and the third party's response, were subject to litigation …Web
اقرأ أكثر
No litigation privilege for controller of litigation under conduct of
The Sellers contended that Guinness Peat was binding authority for the proposition that where a person is "in all but name" a party to proceedings, then that …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership
1. This is an appeal by the two plaintiffs in an action, Guinness Peat Properties Ltd. and G.M.Group Finance Ltd., from an order of His Honour Judge Fox-Andrews, Q.C. made on 27th March 1987. It concerns a claim for privilege made in respect of a letter which was dated 27th June 1984. The defendants to the action and respondents to the appeal ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership
87/0296 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION OFFICIAL REFEREE'S BUSINESS HIS HONOUR JUDGE FOX-ANDREWS Royal Courts of Justice MR. STANLEY BURNTON Q.C. and MISS MARY MORGAN (instructed by Messrs McKenna & Co.) …Web
اقرأ أكثر