M/S. D.J Stone Crusher v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the Revenue. Accordingly, all the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Judgment Search
Honorable Judges. Please choose only one of the following. Sitting Judges Select Judge Name. Former Judges Select Judge Name. Reported.Web
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Haryana Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 …
Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
'Separatism, Stone Pelting Things Of The Past': Amit Shah
Today's Supreme Court verdict on the abrogation of Article 370 is historic and constitutionally upholds the decision taken by the Parliament of India on 5th August 2019; it is a resounding declaration of hope, progress and unity for our sisters and brothers in Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh. ... The verdict today is not just a legal judgment; it is ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
New Tarai Stone Crusher vs State Of Uttarakhand on 30 October, …
19) Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Uttarakhand & others vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher in Civil Appeal 4874 of 2017 decided on 15.09.2017 has dealt with a similar issue wherein M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher filed a petition before this High Court for quashing the order dated 14.06.1999 issued by the Conservator of Forest and …Web
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttaranchal And Others v. Kumaon Stone Crusher . | Supreme
Kumaon Stone Crusher) and other connected matters, the following directions were passed by this Court on 12-11-2013 (2018) 14 SCC 641:"The operation of the impugned judgment(s) passed by the High Court shall remain stayed in these matters subject to the following conditions:Web
اقرأ أكثر
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry. ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing units in and around New Delhi. Unlicensed units were immediately closed and the rest are to be shut down by August 15.Web
اقرأ أكثر
M/S MAHAVEER STONE CRUSHING CO. v. TATA MOTORS LTD. | Supreme Court …
get free access to the complete judgment in m/s mahaveer stone crushing co. v. tata motors ltd. on casemine. ... in the supreme court of india. civil appellate jurisdiction. civil appeal no(s). 6730/2010 m/s mahaveer stone crushing co. appellant(s) versus. tata motors ltd. respondent(s)Web
اقرأ أكثر
J U D G M E N T
directed the stoppage of operations of stone quarries in the Sarisua Hills. Aggrieved thereby, the Appellants, who were the lease holders of these stone quarries, filed an application for impleadment which was rejected by the NGT on 04.12.2019. On 18.02.2020, the NGT disposed of the Original Application by directing that no miningWeb
اقرأ أكثر
Ashok Stone Crusher,... v. State Of Uttarakhand...
Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004 (M/S), Ms. Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal. In view of the aforesaid judgment, no transit fees can be levied on the petitioner under the Forest Act.Web
اقرأ أكثر
Kankale Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka | Karnataka High Court
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the R3 Licensing Authority to extend the validity period of license issued in Form-C up till 31.3.2018 in terms of amendment carried out to Section 5 of Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011, as amended in 2013, in respect of ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
K.C. Stone Crushing Co. And Others v. State Of Haryana And …
However, in the said judgement passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no discussion in respect of any bar to release of vehicles on superdari. Order dt. 7.5.2019 passed by Honble Supreme Court in In the said case, an order dated 10.1.2019 passed by NGT in . I.A. No. 22/2019 in O.A. No. 670/2018 had been challenged.Web
اقرأ أكثر
Court No.
Petitioner :- Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another ... This is also the view of the Supreme Court in the judgement reported in …Web
اقرأ أكثر
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry
ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone …Web
اقرأ أكثر
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi …
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi Land Use Case: Stone Crushers) 1. We reserved judgment in these matters on April 24, 1992. We heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. We have been taken through the provisions of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, Master Plan for Delhi …Web
اقرأ أكثر
MS SAPTAGIRI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF …
Placing reliance on the above said judgment, he would submit to this Court that the issue involved in the present case is identical and the said issue is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in W.P.2035/2020. 6. We have perused the judgment passed by this Court in the above said writ petition.Web
اقرأ أكثر
For Quarry Permits For Temporary Extraction: Bombay High …
the associations of stone crusher owners, the petitioner in Writ Petition No.2731/2022 is ... environmental clearance certificate goes against the judgment of the Supreme Court inWeb
اقرأ أكثر
ABHISHEK STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA | Karnataka High Court
The petitioner has been also granted a licence under Section 3 of the Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 (for short 'the said Act of 2011') for carrying out crushing activities which is valid up to 20th February 2035. 3. By the impugned order at Annexure-L dated 30th July 2019, the petitioner has been called upon to stop the ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
Aravallis broken beyond repair
So, the only way left was legal intervention, and a few landmark judgements attempted to offer respite. In 1985, environment lawyer M C Mehta filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Union government, Haryana government, central and state pollution control boards and 65 stone crushing companies that were operating on the …Web
اقرأ أكثر
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004
M.C. Mehta v Union of India is a landmark case in environmental law, where the Supreme Court of India ordered the closure of industries polluting the Ganga river. The case illustrates the principle of public interest litigation and the role of the judiciary in protecting the environment. Read more about the facts, issues and outcomes of this case and its …Web
اقرأ أكثر
SERVICE TAX ON MINING ROYALTY – Digest of case laws
Seven Judges Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of India Cement Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu & Others, (1990) 1 SCC 12 has already held that mining royalty is a tax. However, the said judgment of Supreme Court in India Cements has been referred to Nine Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Mineral Area Development Authority ...Web
اقرأ أكثر
M.C. Mehta Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others Etc. Etc on 15 …
(1) The mechanical stone crushers established/operating in Lal Kuan, Anand Parbat, Rajokri, Tughlakabad and in any other area of Union territory of Delhi shall stop …Web
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Sarswati Stone Crushers ... vs Urja Vibhag on 14 February, …
The order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to Section 3 of 1949 Act, observed that, the stone crushing activities carried out by those other than mine owners and at a distinct place than the mine are not …Web
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Uttaranchal And Others v. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Get free access to the complete judgment in State Of Uttaranchal And Others v. Kumaon Stone Crusher . on CaseMine.Web
اقرأ أكثر
M/S Upkar Stone Crusher vs Ut Of J&K & Ors on 4 June, 2021
12. Recently the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 847 elaborately dealt. with the scope and applicability of audi alteram partem rule. Hon'ble. the Supreme Court after surveying the entire case law, in paragraph. No.39 held thus:-"39. An analysis of the aforesaid judgments thus reveals:Web
اقرأ أكثر
M.C Mehta v. Union Of India And Others | Supreme Court Of …
The team shall also examine the working of the stone crushers and pulverisers in the area. Initially report regarding mines may be filed. We request Dr Khanna to have the report filed in this Court within ten days." The NEERI has filed its inspection report dated 20-4-1996. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the mine-operators at length. 4.Web
اقرأ أكثر
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors vs Bhag Singh & Others on 11 …
In absence of any unimpeachable scientific material placed on record by the State of Himachal Pradesh or the stone crushers in pursuance of order of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 15.03.2019 though a period of more than three months has gone, after hearing learned Advocate General for the State and for the stone crushers, we are unable to …Web
اقرأ أكثر
JANAPRIYA STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF KARNATAKA | Karnataka High Court
2. On the application made by the petitioner for grant of a licence under Section 3 of the Karnataka Regulations of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 (for short 'the said Act of 2011'), Form-B1 has been issued under the Karnataka Regulations of Stone Crushers Rules, 2012 (for short 'the said Rules of 2012').Web
اقرأ أكثر
M/S SHRI RAM STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF HARYANA | Supreme Court …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S SHRI RAM STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF HARYANA on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S SHRI RAM STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF HARYANA on CaseMine. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to …Web
اقرأ أكثر
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL v. M/S. KUMAON STONE CRUSHER | Supreme Court …
crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 62. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed. Reliance is placed on Two Judge Bench inWeb
اقرأ أكثر